I have read just a
few books with two POV’s. But in almost all these books we can consider both
the characters as the main ones. A friend told me about a book where both the main characters narrate
alternate chapters. I read a review of a book online where the two main
characters present the stories from their points of view: in each chapter they
see things differently. I thought that
was a cool way of seeing things. I am yet to read books with more than two
POV’s.
Rick Riordan’s series
Kane Chronicles has the two main characters, the siblings Sadie and Carter each
telling their version of the story. To avoid confusion underneath the chapter
heading the author mentions the name of the character whose point of view is
being presented. I enjoyed these books tremendously. I felt it was unusual and
quirky as both the characters had their charm and individual way of story
telling.
I must mention that I have just read one
story where the main character was the antagonist. I found it very different
from the usual stories I normally read.
Do you feel
stories with points of views of different characters and not the main character
can be successful? What do you feel about stories told from the POV of the
antagonist? Do the antagonists then become
the protagonists in such stories and the protagonists the antagonists? Can such
stories work? Which POV do you all prefer in your stories, both as a writer and
reader?
I like stories with more than one point of view. Mine were written from the two main character's point of view.
ReplyDeleteNice food for thought for writing, Rachna! Less hard work for critics in such a situation, to get divergent views in the story itself:)
ReplyDeleteYou touched upon something that seems simple, but POV really is the thing that dictates the whole book!
ReplyDeleteSo really, it could be the most important decision an author can make!
I have never read any book with two POV's , Its nice thought though, suggest me some books which has two POV's.
ReplyDeleteThere are various ways of doing POV and they all work, if done correctly.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me that the point of view, or views, needs to be in service to the story. Some work best with two points of view, but other tales might be too confusing with more than one POV. Also, who is best suited to tell the story depends on the novel and the writer's intent. It can be tricky figuring out how to best tell a story.
ReplyDeleteI'd love to sahre your writings with my students. May I?
ReplyDeleteSorry! I mean SHARE!
ReplyDeleteDan Brown's books hop between many characters heads, from the main character to other major ones and even minor ones. He does it incredibly well and it really adds to the story.
ReplyDeleteThough I haven't read them, just watched the show, George Martin does this with the Game of Thrones series. He does it chapter by chapter I think.
I am one of your regular followers and I must say your post are very helpful as I do creative writing classes
ReplyDeletewith my students.
with POVs I haven't really thought about it until now, thank you for that and if you could shed some more light on this, i think it will be very helpful.
I do believe multiple POVs can work, but I also believe they're going out of fashion, which is unfortunate.
ReplyDeleteI don't mind multiple POVs as long as the author seems to know what they're doing (i.e. no sudden POV switches, the POVs are different from each other or distinct enough to be recognized as separate from the other POV, both charcters are vital to the story, etc.).
ReplyDeleteI've always loved multiple points of view, from Kim S. Robinson to George R.R. Martin. For me, the more the merrier.
ReplyDeleteThrillers work well when in both the protagonist's and the antagonist's point of views. For some stories, it ups the suspense.
ReplyDelete